ACTION RESEARCH
Overview
Action Research has its origin in the
works of the social psychologist Kurt Lewin (1946). He developed the ideas of
group decision and commitment to improvement at work situations (classroom
and administrative). It is an act of analysing a situation leading to certain
action for improvement and evaluating the result of the tried out action.
Action research is focussed on immediate application. It places the emphasis
on the problem here and now, in a school setting. Its findings are to be
evaluated in terms of local applicability and improvement in school
practices. The whole purpose of Action Research is to involve classroom
teachers to attempt to solve their classroom problems.
A Conceptual
Analysis
Action research is a form of
self-reflective enquiry undertaken by participants in serial situations in
order to improve the rationality and justice of their own social or
educational practices, as well as their understanding of practices and the
situations in which these practices are carried out.
Groups of participants can be
teachers, students, principals, parents and other community members. In
education, action research has been employed in school
based curriculum development, professional development, school improvement
programmes and systems planning and policy development (for example, in
relation to policy about classroom rules, school policies, about
non-competitive assessment, and state policies about the conduct of school
improvement programmes.)
The idea of linking of terms “action”
and “research” highlights the essential feature of the approach: trying
out ideas in practice as a means of improvement and as a means of increasing
knowledge about curriculum, teaching and learning. The result is
improvement in what happens in the classroom and school. Action research
provides a way of working which links theory and practice into one whole: ideas-in-action.
Reflective practices
seeks to make sense of processes, problems, issues, and constraints made
available in strategic action.
It takes account of the variety of
perspectives, possible in the social situation and comprehends the issues and
circumstances in which they arise.
Refection leads to the reconstruction
of the meaning of a situation and provides the basis for the revised plan.
Reflection has evaluative aspect- it asks action researchers to weigh their
experience – to judge whether effects and issues which arose were desirable,
and suggest ways of proceeding.
|
Definition
According to Stephen Corey
(1953)
“Action Research must be taken up by
those who may have to change the way they do think as a result of the study
singly and in groups. They must use their imagination and creativity
constructively to identify the practices that must be changed to meet the
needs and demands of modern life, courageously try out those practices that
give better promise and methodically and systematically gather evidence to
test their worth.”
Mouly is of the opinion that
Action Research is an “on the spot
research aimed at the solution of an immediate classroom problem.”
Kurt Lewin says,
“Action Research is applying
scientific thinking to real life problems (classroom problems for teachers)
and represents a great improvement over teacher’s subjective judgments and
their limited personal experiences.”
According to Hammersley, 1993
(p.237)...
Action researches are small scale and
narrowly focused researches undertaken by teachers in a given context. It has
also been refered to as research into practice by practitioners, for
practitioners.
|
Scope of Action Research
Action research is focused on immediate
application, not on the development of a theory, not upon general application.
It has placed its emphasis on a problem here and now in a local setting. Many
Action Research projects are carried out in a classroom by a single teacher. As
it becomes more extensive it becomes more similar to other types of educational
research. The emphasis is Action Research, not on obtaining generalisable
scientific knowledge about educational problems but on obtaining knowledge concerning
a specific local problem.
The function of action research
therefore, is to combine the research function with teacher growth in such
qualities as objective thinking, skill in research processes, ability to work
harmoniously with others and develop professional spirit. Quite often, many
teachers will not have the time, resources, or technical background to engage
in formal research activity but more teachers can be involved in action
research activity and model studies may be undertaken for the purpose of trying
to improve local classroom practices.
Key points
Characteristic features of Action
Research
1.
It is situational
2.
It is a reflective inquiry
3.
It is based on scientific approach
4.
It is a scientific way of Solving
Problems
5.
It is a small scale intervention
6.
It is a way to find remedies to
overcome obstacles in learning
7.
It provides avenues for the teachers
to be innovative
8.
It is a unified exercise to bridge
the gap between theory and practice
9.
It is a way to develop self
confidence in teachers
10.It is self-evaluative
|
Let us differentiate
them…
The difference between the fundamental
or basic research and action research can be summarized as given below against
certain criteria.
Difference Between
Basic Research and Action Research
|
||
Criteria
|
Basic Research
|
Action Research
|
Objectives
|
Develop
and test educational theory and derive generalizations.
|
To
find solutions to problems in a specific context.
|
Training
|
Intensive
training is needed in Research Methodology.
|
Limited
training is needed.
|
Selection of a problem
|
A
wide range of methods are used to select a problem.
|
Participating
teacher identify problems during the teaching-learning processes.
|
Hypothesis
|
Highly
specific hypotheses are developed.
|
Specific
statement of the problem serves as hypotheses.
|
Review of Literature
|
An
exhaustive and thorough review of literature is required.
|
No
such thorough review of literature is needed.
|
Sample
|
Considerably
large sample size is required.
|
Students
studying in the class of a teacher forms sample.
|
Experimental Design
|
Well
thought experimental design is developed to maintain comparable conditions
and reducing error and bias.
|
Procedures
are planned only in general terms.
|
Analysis of Data
|
Complex
analysis is often called for.
|
Simple
analysis procedures are usually sufficient.
|
Conclusions
|
Conclusions
may be in the form of generalizations and developing theories.
|
Findings
are local specific.
|
Application of results
|
The
generalizations have broad applicability
|
Findings
are used immediately in the classroom situations by participating teachers to
improve their own practices
|
Four issues in which action research is different
1. It
is not the usual thing teachers do when think about their teaching.
Action research is more systematic and collaborative in collecting evidence on
which to base rigorous group reflection.
2. It
is not simply problem solving. Action research involves problem –solving,
not just problem solving. It motivated by a quest to improve and understand the
word by changing it and learning how to improve it from the effects of changes
made.
3. It
is not research done on other people. Action research is research by
particular people on their own work, to help them improve what they do,
including how they work with and for others. Action research treats people as
autonomous, responsible agents who participate actively in making their own
practices to be more effective. It does not treat people as objects for
research , but encourages people to work together as knowing subjects and
agents of change and improvement.
4. It
is not ‘ the scientific method’ applied to teaching. Action research is
not just about hypotheses-testing or about using data to come to conclusions.
Action research is not just about hypotheses-testing or about using data to
come to conclusions. Action research is concerned with changing situations, not
just interpreting them like in historical sciences. Action research is
systematically evolving, a living process changing both the researcher and the
situations in which he/she acts; neither the natural sciences nor the
historical sciences have their double aim.
Reflection
Are there Steps in Action Research?
1.
Identification of the problem
2.
Pin-pointing the problem
3.
Diagnosing the causes of the problems
4.
Formulation of action hypothesis
5.
Designing the action plan
6.
Implementation of the action
programme
Implementation of the action program
Do you agree with these steps as
necessary for an action research? Think it over
|
Action research is aimed at finding a solution to a problem in a specific context. There is no hypotheses but rather a specific statement of the problem. There is identification of the problem but not diagnosing the causes. I therefore think that in Action Research the steps are not necessary
ReplyDeleteAction research is relevant in the improvement of an organisation or community having the same vision, mission and goals. It is participatory in nature in that the target group is explicitly part of the research.
ReplyDeleteAction research is a participatory exercise which involve both parties the researcher and respondents in finding solutions for the identified problems .this makes it a problem solving research thus a practice for improvement. i agree that the steps are necessary
DeleteI agree that these steps are necessary for action research reason being Action research emphasizes more on understanding and solving the problem rather than theory building.
ReplyDeleteThe steps are important but may not need a chronological order.Action research doesn't necessarily need detailed steps because it doesn't need a lot of time trying to understand the real problem but deals with the problem as its presented immediately and it can be done without step 3.
ReplyDeleteAction research is considered to be evaluative and reflective as it aims at bringing about improvement in practice. its collaborative in nature and carried out by teachers in their own classrooms. Therefore the most important steps in carrying out action research would include: problem identification, plan of action, data collection, analysis of data and plan for future action.
ReplyDeleteAction research action research refers to a wide variety of evaluative, investigative, and analytical research methods designed to diagnose problems or weaknesses and help educators develop practical solutions to address them quickly and efficiently. Action research may also be applied to programs that are not necessarily experiencing any problems, but that educators simply want to learn more about and improve. The general goal is to create a simple, practical, repeatable process of iterative learning, evaluation, and improvement that leads to increasingly better results. i thus agree that the above steps are necessary while conducting action research
ReplyDeleteBasic research contains a reactive and proactive approach while Applied research is mainly reactive in approach
ReplyDeleteAction research is initiated to solve an immediate problem
ReplyDelete